PMP-Style Question 19 – team support and performance management

PMP Referenced Question 19: Supporting Team Members Through Knowledge Gaps

This PMP-style scenario tests how a project manager should respond to a team member’s performance issue caused by unfamiliarity with a new system. PMI promotes coaching, mentoring, and empowering team members through support.

📘 Scenario

A project team member is having difficulty delivering assigned tasks for a project that is at risk of being delayed. The main issue is that the team member does not understand a new system that was recently implemented.

❓ Question

What should the project manager do?

  • A. Ask the team member to learn the new system as on-the-job training.
  • B. Issue a change request to extend the project schedule.
  • C. Escalate the team member’s performance to the project sponsor.
  • D. Assign an experienced resource to support the team member.
⚠️ Disclaimer: This PMP-style question is presented for educational and commentary purposes only. It is not sourced from any official PMI exam and is not intended to violate any copyright. This content reflects interpretations based on the PMI mindset and principles, and is designed to help learners prepare for the PMP exam. If this question resembles real PMP exam content, it is coincidental and used solely under the doctrine of fair use for academic discussion. No claim of affiliation with or endorsement by PMI is made.

✅ Correct Answer: D. Assign an experienced resource to support the team member

  • 🎯 The team member lacks knowledge — not motivation or capability.
  • 🧑‍🏫 Assigning a mentor boosts learning speed and maintains project momentum.
  • 🧠 PMI encourages coaching, not punishment or delay, as a first response to performance gaps.

✔ Why Option D is Correct

Supporting a team member through mentorship empowers them to overcome the challenge and contributes to a learning culture. PMI sees this as a leadership trait — enabling growth and sustaining delivery.

✖ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

  • A. Ask the team member to learn the new system as on-the-job training
    🔻 Ineffective under time pressure. This approach delays progress further, especially without guidance. It’s too passive when the project is already at risk.
  • B. Issue a change request to extend the project schedule
    🔻 Premature. A change request should be used only after all internal remedies are exhausted. The issue is skill-based, not scope- or requirement-driven.
  • C. Escalate the team member’s performance to the project sponsor
    🔻 Inappropriate at this stage. Escalation is a last resort, and the issue is about knowledge gap, not misconduct or recurring poor performance. The project manager should first attempt coaching and support.

📌 Key Takeaway

PMI promotes servant leadership — help your team succeed. Mentoring is the best response when performance issues are caused by skill gaps, not behavior.

PMP candidates must demonstrate emotional intelligence and leadership when addressing skill-based performance gaps. PMI expects support and coaching before delay, escalation, or criticism.

Exit mobile version