⚠️ Disclaimer: This PMP-style question is presented for educational and commentary purposes only. It is not sourced from any official PMI exam and is not intended to violate any copyright. This content reflects interpretations based on the PMI mindset and principles, and is designed to help learners prepare for the PMP exam. If this question resembles real PMP exam content, it is coincidental and used solely under the doctrine of fair use for academic discussion. No claim of affiliation with or endorsement by PMI is made.

✅ Correct Answer: C. Hybrid approach

• 🚧 The project has **high uncertainty** → suggests Agile is helpful.
• 📅 But there is a **mandatory fixed delivery date** → favors Predictive control.
• 🔁 Combining both offers the flexibility of Agile with the control of Predictive.

✔ Why Option C is Correct

The Hybrid approach allows the project to manage uncertainty using iterative development (Agile), while also using Predictive tools like milestone planning or fixed-phase reviews to ensure compliance with critical dates. PMI encourages Hybrid for mixed-risk, mixed-flexibility environments.

✖ Why Other Options Are Incorrect

• A. Predictive lacks flexibility for high uncertainty. It may fail to adapt in time.
• B. Kanban alone does not manage fixed dates well — it’s flow-based and open-ended.
• D. Agile alone could cause delays if not tied to a firm delivery structure. Customer is already worried about “too many iterations.”

📌 Key Takeaway

Hybrid approaches give project managers the agility to respond to changing needs while respecting organizational constraints like fixed delivery timelines. Use Hybrid when both adaptability and predictability are critical.